Wednesday, January 4, 2012

Cee Lo Green Angers John Lennon Fans With 'Imagine' Lyrics

Green changed a key line in Lennon's song during his New Year's Eve performance.
By James Montgomery


Cee Lo Green
Photo: Kevin Winter/ Getty Images

How did you spend your New Year's Eve? Well, if you were Cee Lo Green, you began by royally ticking off John Lennon fans, then briefly apologizing for your transgressions before finally agreeing to disagree.

Yes, Green caught some heat after changing a key line to Lennon's 1971 classic "Imagine" during his performance on NBC's New Year's Eve telecast — he turned the pointed "And no religion too" into the far more, uh, inclusive "And all religion's true" — a move that drew criticism from longtime Lennon fans. In a flurry of tweets, they chastised him for everything from messing with the song's true message to causing the late musician to roll over in his grave, a response that had Green on the defensive.

After his performance, he took to his Twitter account to apologize, writing, "Yo I meant no disrespect by changing the lyric guys ... I was trying to say a world where u could believe what u wanted, that's all." Of course, soon after, Green apparently had a change of heart, deleting his mea culpa (and all related tweets), and replacing them with a simple "Happy new year everyone!"

In a follow-up tweet, he took a subtle jab at his detractors, writing that he was currently listening to "We Just Disagree" by Dave Mason, though, in response to a fan's question, he said that his playlist choice had nothing to do with the "Imagine" flap and everything to do with "indifference in general." Of course, Lennon fans will probably be happy to know that, according to Green's latest tweet, he's also been listening to "I'm Only Sleeping," a Beatles track from their seminal Revolver album.

A spokesperson for Green could not be reached for comment on the matter by press time.

Related Artists

Source: http://www.mtv.com/news/articles/1676660/cee-lo-john-lennon-imagine-lyrics.jhtml

michelle rounds cabin in the woods dan quayle brett favre packers stock packers stock mastectomy

Tuesday, January 3, 2012

WWE.com's no-fail Twitter tips

Managing the @WWEUniverse account, we get tons of requests for shoutouts. It's your birthday, you want a retweet. You won the state championships in football, you want a RT. But let's face it, with millions of followers across all Twitter accounts, it's hard to get to everyone. Now just imagine being a WWE Superstar or Diva. Their accounts are filled with praise, some not-so-much praise and hundreds of questions on a daily - sometimes hourly - basis.

WWE.com has some tips on getting that RT you've been looking for from your favorite Superstars and Divas.


1. Artwork - Nothing catches and eye like a good picture. This could be an amazing avatar of your favorite Superstar or Diva, maybe an incredible hand-drawn piece of artwork or a cool Twitter skin they can use.?"I'm very much a visual person," former Divas Champion Alicia Fox noted. "So I really like when people send me sketches of themselves or me in my 'Fox' hood. I love those."?

?
2. Asking for a RT typically doesn't work. Hey, it's my birthday, can I get a RT? Dolph Ziggler weighed in on all the RT requests. "'Please, RT, please answer.' Yeah, I get it. You're asking the questions." said the active Tweeter and showoff about his Twitter talk with the WWE Universe. "Anything clever gets a RT from me, whether it's factual or not. If you get a laugh out of me, that gets my respect."

?
3. Be respectful. If you wouldn't say it to their face, don't type it. Sure, we all get a dose of keyboard courage from time to time, but it's important to keep it in check. Yes, it's really easy to hide amongst the millions behind a Twitter handle, but that doesn't make it right. "It's important to be genuine in your interactions with me," Ezekiel Jackson explained of his positive tweeting habits. "Don't ask a question to simply get a response."

?
4. Everyone loves a little praise. Who doesn't love to get patted on the back every once in awhile. It's rewarding and makes your feel good. But "praise" under the
veil of lying doesn't always work.?"Hey, @ZackRyder, you're my favorite Superstar! But your picture is Randy Orton? #areyouseriousbro?" the 2011 Trending Superstar of the Year told WWE.com. "I do read all of them, so keep tweeting me, watching my YouTube show and buy my T-shirt."

?Now that you have the tips, keep tweeting us at WWE.com using the @WWEUniverse account, and tweeting your favorite Superstars and Divas!

?

Source: http://www.wwe.com/inside/wwefeaturepage/wwe-twitter-tips-superstars

nl mvp verlander verlander justin verlander pepper spraying cop pepper spraying cop somaya reece

Ford Explorer, 1997 (R), Automatic LPG, 58,000 miles

Post a FREE ad now!

new & IMPROVED - Only takes 60 seconds

View all Fords

Open map

Buyers' Advice

Remember to inspect the listed vehicle to make sure they are all working before buying a used vehicle. Read more Motors Buyer'sadvice.

Call me on 07036 240034

? 2,000

Posted

1997 Ford explorer 4.0 V6 only done 58,000 miles Tax and mot til jan 2012 it has towbar, tinted windows, dvd player, tinted lexus rear lights, ford F150 grill, and a side exit exhaust ( but i have a full system for cats back aswell) and its LPG!! with i think an 80/90l tank. loads of toys ready for the snow. its just to big for me. Call now on 07036 240034

Location: Reading,?Berkshire,? RG17? (show?on?map)

  • Year: 1997 (R)
  • Transmission: Automatic
  • Fuel: LPG
  • Mileage: 58,000
  • Colour: Red

Important: Freeads Classifieds advises you not to part with money until you have verified the authenticity of the goods or met the buyer directly. For more advice on safer online buying click here. Freeads Classifieds is not responsible for the accuracy or legitimacy of any Freead. Please read our advice and disclaimer and read about current known scams. We also suggest using an escrow service.

Calls to private sellers are routed through the Freeads Classifieds private response service - more information

Similar Ads

Source: http://www.freeads.co.uk/uk/buy__sell/motors/cars/ford/14481841/ford-explorer-1997-r-automatic-lpg-58000-miles/view

chicago news chicago news barnaby barnaby giuliana rancic giuliana rancic the cabin in the woods

Monday, January 2, 2012

Raymond J. Learsy: The New York Times Continues To Pump Up The Price Of Oil To The Oil Industry's Joy


No critical commodity moves as much on rhetoric, as on supply and demand fundamentals, as does crude oil. Over the years few news services, perceived as being disinterested purveyors of news and information has lent its imprimatur more to the upward distortion of oil prices than the New York Times.

In keeping with what now has become a sorry tradition, the New York Times on Thursday gave the oil patch and its allied interests good reason to pop champagne corks two days early, in celebration of the New Year. Assuming a mantle of authority, conveying to us as received wisdom from on high, The New York Times presented to is readership, packaged in the babble of well honed oil industry mantra, illuminations the likes of which a well oiled oil industry flack would have been embarrassed to disseminate. We were to be instructed by the good scribes of the Times, in their lead story in the Business Section, that "Oil Prices Predicted to Stay Above $100 a Barrel Through Next Year."

The article ends "Consumers have this belief that prices will either go up or they will remain at elevated levels." The reportage fills three quarters of a New York Times page in regaling us with reasons that at the very least "elevated levels" will remain, with the subtext that we should celebrate such an outcome, as prices might very well go higher. It was the kind of reporting that had the oil gang cheering, having recently reported bottom line record earnings with those oil prices at "current" levels (while the rest of the country is still in a deep funk).

The article also made us feel better by pointing out that "The United States economy managed to cope this year despite triple digit prices for barrels of oil." Such is the information we are fed by the New York Times' scribes, seemingly safe at their business desk sinecures, frighteningly oblivious of a near nine percent unemployment rate throughout the land, the millions out of work not to speak of the millions evicted from their foreclosed homes, and not coping in the least.

Other than references to foreign policy issues being played out, such as Iran's threat to blockade the Strait of Hormuz and all that would entail, the Times hastens to instruct us that oil prices have an innate right to hover at their current astronomical heights. This by citing that "Many governments in the Middle East spent heavily on social assistance programs in response to the unrest of the Arab Spring and are depending on higher prices to meet their budgets." Now, does that make you feel warmer up there in Maine?

And when it comes to higher prices no mention is made of the breakdown of our oversight agencies such as the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) and its failure to rein in excessive speculation in oil prices. (Please see "Time to Dismiss The CFTC Chairman And His Commissioners" 12.27.11). It is not just my layman's opinion, but much more significantly that of Rex Tillerson, CEO of the world's largest oil giant, ExxonMobil, who to his great credit, in testimony before the Senate Finance Committee in May 2011 expressed his exasperation that the then current price of oil at $100/bbl incorporated some thirty to forty dollars in its price resulting from speculation (Please see "Are Our Leaders Hearing ExxonMobil CEO Rex Tillerson 05.17.11)

Nor did the article make any reference to that fundamental game changer, the vast deposits being discovered of low cost natural gas. Through new drilling techniques such as environmentally aware fracking, enormous reservoirs of shale gas have been identified in dimensions barely understood just a few years ago- enough to meet domestic needs for the next 150 years. The potential is so large, a consensus is building that it will lead to American energy independence.

In years past, oil and natural gas prices moved up and down in near lockstep. Such was the case when oil prices peaked at $147/bbl in the summer of 2008 (helping to bring on the housing crisis and the financial meltdown in September of that year). The price of natural gas at that time was near $15 mmbtu. Today, while the price of oil rests near $100/bbl, as quoted on the New York Mercantile Exchange for West Texas Intermediate (WTI), the price of natural has dropped to under $3 per mmbtu. At that price for natural gas the comparable energy quotient in a barrel of oil would bring its price down to less than $20 a barrel. Clearly, with a differential of this magnitude, and natural gas being environmentally friendlier than oil based commodities such as gasoline, some substitution will begin to weigh on the consumption of oil, whether in home heating or starting with the conversion of trucks to being powered by natural gas rather than gasoline/diesel. It is a trend only beginning now, that will have major impact on the need for, and consumption of crude oil in the years ahead.

Yet here again, instead of reporting clearly on this development and its enormous potential, the New York Times engaged in reportage bordering on yellow journalism (Please see "New York Times Flays Natural Gas..."06.28.11) with two articles filled with conjecture bordering on disinformation: "Insiders Sound Alarm Amid a Natural Gas Rush 06.25.11," and "Behind Veneer, Doubt on Future of Natural Gas" 06.26.11 placing the entire shale gas revolution into question, interjecting terminology such as 'Ponzi Scheme' 'Dot-Com Bubble' and on. This in the face of billions of dollars investment into the shale gas and shale oil plays by such 'doubters' as ExxonMobil, Shell, Chevron, the Norwegian national oil company Statoil, the Chinese government owned CNOOC, and Total, the French oil behemoth. The list goes on. But the Times instructed us otherwise, thereby helping to keep oil prices on the ascent by vesting us with the ignorance needed to accept high and manipulated oil prices unquestioningly.

It has been a tradition of distortion or misinformation dating back years whether sweeping the manipulations of OPEC under the rug, or heralding the pronouncements of that oil price manipulator par excellence and OPEC's premier protagonist Saudi Arabia, without a questioning eye. (Please see "The New York Times Continues Its Fawning Coverage of Saudi Oil Policies" 03.22.10))

Sadly, the New York Times, on the issue of how oil prices are determined has become a leading apologist of industry excess, government connivance, seemingly oblivious to the distortion of pricing instigated by OPEC, the commodity exchanges with their nurturing of excess speculation, Wall Street and its feckless proprietary trading financed in large measure through beneficent government programs.

Given its standing, given the thrust of its coverage, the Times has become an important contributor to the public's baleful acceptance of having their pockets picked by the oil interests the world over.

?

?

?

Follow Raymond J. Learsy on Twitter: www.twitter.com/raymondLearsy

Source: http://www.huffingtonpost.com/raymond-j-learsy/the-new-york-times-contin_b_1179234.html

new years eve ball drop new years eve times square 2012 prosperity 2012 holidays phish yellow cab japan earthquake

Endorsement game intensifies, but does it matter? (AP)

MANCHESTER, N.H. ? It may be overrated, but the political endorsement race won't stop. In fact, it will only accelerate as voting in the GOP presidential contest nears.

Hoping to bolster credibility and build political muscle, Republican presidential contenders have jockeyed for months to woo governors and congressional lawmakers, state senators and county sheriffs, newspaper editorial boards and tea party activists. The game has been dominated so far by former Massachusetts Gov. Mitt Romney, who appears to have captured more endorsements than the rest of the field combined.

But Jeff Frost, like many Republicans in early voting states, isn't impressed. Frost, who is chairman of the Manchester Republican Committee, said New Hampshire voters don't much like being told which candidate to support.

"We're a stubborn bunch of horse traders," he said.

Indeed, candidates and voters alike suggest the impact of political endorsements is unclear at best. Any potential blowback, however, isn't enough to stop campaigns from trotting out new supporters as quickly as they can sign them up.

It didn't matter that the New Hampshire Union Leader has a spotty record of picking winners. Newt Gingrich claimed instant credibility after capturing its endorsement. Former Pennsylvania Sen. Rick Santorum proudly won over Iowa social conservative leader Bob Vander Plaats. Texas Gov. Rick Perry, while touring Iowa, recently dispatched his latest high-profile supporter, conservative businessman Steve Forbes, to New Hampshire.

In most cases, the campaigns shop their big-name backers to local reporters, arrange meetings with voters and use their names and voices in fundraising appeals. Some also offer an instant infrastructure to handle nuts-and-bolts political chores that have tripped up less-organized candidates. That was the case recently in Virginia, where leading Romney supporter Lt. Gov. Bill Boiling shared his political network to help collect thousands of signatures so Romney could qualify for the primary ballot. Gingrich and Perry failed to qualify.

There's also the buzz that comes with any endorsement, producing days or a few hours of positive media coverage that may inspire confidence among wavering supporters.

Republican candidate Jon Huntsman has struggled to attract big names but recently won the backing of three New Hampshire newspapers, including the capital city's Concord Monitor. His campaign blasted news of the endorsements to reporters.

But even Huntsman acknowledged their impact may be minimal come Election Day.

"It's recognition that you are a legitimate candidate and people think well of you," Huntsman said. "What it does in terms of bringing support around in real numbers that would be quantifiable, I don't have any way of measuring that. I just don't know if it matters at all at the end of the day. But anything that provides additional credibility is a good thing."

The people who endorse candidates are also freer to go negative. Romney supporter and former New Hampshire Gov. John H. Sununu has repeatedly jabbed at Gingrich for "whining." Forbes did much the same thing in New Hampshire for Perry, suggesting that the Texas governor has more "soul" than Romney.

Forbes, once a presidential contender himself, is considered popular in New Hampshire. But a handful of public appearances and media interviews are unlikely to sway any voters, according to Phyllis Woods, one of New Hampshire's two members of the Republican National Committee.

"I think in New Hampshire, there are precious few people who will make their decision based on an endorsement," she said.

There are always exceptions.

Romney helped create an air of inevitability in the fall after earning the endorsement of New Jersey Gov. Chris Christie, an outspoken conservative favorite. That was strengthened when Romney subsequently won over a tea party favorite, South Carolina Gov. Nikki Haley.

Dave Roederer, an unaligned Republican who was John McCain's Iowa campaign chairman in 2008, said such high-profile endorsements are helpful.

"Iowa's not a big endorsement-type state, but the fact of the matter is that people will obviously stop and listen to somebody who's a big name like that," Roederer said of Christie and Haley. "It helps."

Santorum hopes people will notice rounds of lesser-known Iowa Republicans, from pastors and politicians alike, whom he's courted with some success in recent weeks. His top prize so far has been Vander Plaats, whose Family Leader organization worked to oust judges who helped usher in gay marriage in Iowa. The organization itself, however, declined to endorse.

In the endorsement race, which candidate gets the most is also a contest.

Romney's campaign says he's collected more than 1,900 endorsements, including conservative activists and current and former elected officials in all 50 states. The list includes four governors, 48 House members and 11 senators.

No one else comes close.

Source: http://us.rd.yahoo.com/dailynews/rss/politics/*http%3A//news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20111230/ap_on_el_pr/us_endorsement_game

bcs standings douglas fir jim boeheim jim boeheim bill of rights toys r us toys r us

Sunday, January 1, 2012

New post from Twitter user @BasilPuglisi in the chatbox Digital Brand Marketing Education (i)

Sorry, Readability was unable to parse this page for content.

Source: http://mychatbox.me/chatter/p/161572/

iron chef bath and body works coupons jeff probst jeff probst king jong il dead south korea baron davis

Exposition

Ahh. This is a great question. xD

The trouble a lot of introductions run into is they start with such a wide scope, talking about the universe in the broadest of strokes, that there's no way for potential players to hook themselves in. I know you said not to mention Star Wars, but seriously look at how the movies themselves did it. You start with the screen crawl "LONG LONG AGO IN A GALAXY FAR FAR AWAY" which, y'know, is about as broad as you can get but very quickly you're drawn into the story because the characters are instantly relatable, and you're not lost still in gobs of explanatory things.

I hope that makes sense. One of the greatest ways to get exposition out is to involve the reader. I remember a sci-fi RP once on another board where the GM spoke to potential readers as though they were late to a classroom session where their potential mission was being outlined. Having a fantasy opening being told as a "sonnet" by a minstrel by a fire.

Implying exposition through dialogue, or having brief narrative moments explain things is also an option. Showing the reader a shrine to a deity and how it has cracked and been overgrown with time speaks volumes of a country leaving its roots behind more than just telling us about it.

As I say, character is compass. Making the exposition so that the reader feels like they're a part of the story right away rather than waiting for the broad-as-the-sky opener down to finally, finally, why they decided to read through all the pages is the way to go.

I once read a hunk of "this is our world!" extra-IC nonsense that got as detailed as to tell potential players how people blow their nose in the country. That's not okay.

As unorganized as I am, I sure hope you got something outta that.

-VV

Source: http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/RolePlayGateway/~3/lbVP3A7HH9c/viewtopic.php

melasma jimmy rollins jimmy rollins let it snow jason trawick jerry lewis tampa bay bucs